From the five associates of Alexei Navalny in court, asked the head of his staff Leonid Volkov to return the money for the failed election campaign of the independent candidate. Four men and one lady decided that the opposition is profiting from the supporters.
To prepare for the race for the presidency Alexei Navalny decided in advance: money in electoral trouble he had collected in the spring of 2017. For example, one of the plaintiffs, a citizen of Fredin, in last April moved to the map of Volkov, the head of election headquarters of Alexei Navalny on elections of the President of Russia, 500 rubles, it is on the costs associated with the nomination of a candidate.
Moskvich later found out that Navalny has a criminal record (in early 2017 politician was convicted by a Kirov court on charges of embezzlement in the company “Kirovles” and sentenced to 5 years imprisonment) and admitted to the election can not be. In addition, as explained to the voters of the CEC, the nomination of candidates was possible not earlier than the December 2017 — that is, the activity of opposition until the time was outside the official election campaign.
The plaintiff felt cheated and sued for Volkov to return the donation (the same amount of contributions and the requirements were in the other four suits). The magistrate 327 precinct Savyolovsky district described the actions of the Bulk of fundraising as illicit enrichment, and his former supporters felt aggrieved. The money returned to the account of the plaintiffs before the verdict was announced, but since the trial was already running, the court ordered the defendant to pay to citizens and the cost of a state fee of 400 rubles each.
The wolves tried to appeal the decision on payment of state duties, but the second instance, Savelovskiy district court decided to leave the decision in force.
According to the representative Volkov, Vladlena Moose, plaintiffs have not even tried to contact the headquarters for a refund before the trial, and all five cases, except for the names of the plaintiffs, are almost identical.
— All claims are written as a blueprint, says Elk. — It is clear that these people who somehow coordinated. The money was returned and, if this is the decision of the court fees, too, will return.
Get short formal newsletter the best in the “MK” – subscribe to our Telegram.