Ukrainian portal “Open court” announced that the court of Appeal of Kiev refused to recognize the fact of aggression of Russia against Ukraine in Crimea and in the South-East of the country. Thus, left in force the earlier decision of Shevchenkovsky district court of Kiev. The report said that the interior Ministry of Ukraine failed to provide the court with evidence of Russian aggression.
photo: Lily Sharlovskoe
In the court at the time spoke Ukrainian lawyer and human rights activist Stanislav batryn, who demanded to recognize the fact of aggression of Russia. However, on 12 may, the court ruled to deny Batrinu in the lawsuit. The court decided that even if the aggression was, on the rights of the citizen it had no effect. Batrin then said that prosecutors were not against the recognition by the court of such fact, but sharply opposed by the administration of President of Ukraine.
Now Batrin reached the court of Appeal and lost again.
As informs a portal “the Open court”, the court of first instance granted the petition Batrina to the interior Ministry of Ukraine has provided the court evidence of the armed aggression of Russia, the interior Ministry said on its website that owns such materials.
However, as soon as these materials requested by the court, the interior Ministry of Ukraine sent a letter that to provide the documents, as the responsible employee simply absent from the workplace. Well, it is clear that it was the usual runaround.
The plaintiff promised to continue the fight on appeal.