Go to ...

The Newspapers

News from Russia

RSS Feed

Monday, October 24, 2016

Who would chip: e-mail Clinton or provocative cues trump

Watching the pre-election duel Clinton trump, I am increasingly beginning to think that the opponents play in the giveaway. Each of them as if keen to make a blooper that will make him (her) incapable(Oh) to take the post of President of the United States. In this sense, were especially significant last Tuesday 9 August. We already wrote about how that day trump basically called on members of the National rifle Association (NRA) to deal with Clinton. Presidential the scales swung in her direction.

photo: pixabay.com

But Hillary in the same Tuesday made his “back door”. Was published a new piece of e-mail Clinton when she was U.S. Secretary of state. According to her, the interests of bill Clinton and actions of the state Department headed by Hillary, so to speak — the same. The interests of the wealthy donors of the Foundation was satisfied the influence of the state Department.

So, for example, says The New York Times, one e-mail exchange, a representative of the Clinton Foundation requested the state Department to associate a billionaire donor with the US Ambassador in Lebanon at the request of the first. In another letter, the staff of the Fund required from the state Department to employ one of its members. The response of the state Department said: we are working on implementing your requests.

For the past 17 months the presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton is accompanied by the use of her private email server at that time, when she headed the US state Department. The current state Department gave the new documents a conservative organization “defending the law”, which claimed them on the basis of the Law on freedom of information.

Papers number 44, not part of 55,000 that was transferred to Clinton state Department. The latter, in her words, represent “the email associated with her work.”

Tom Fitton, the President of “rule of law” accused Hillary Clinton that she hid these 44 document from the public, as they are contrary to official assurances of non-interference in the Affairs of the Fund to her husband. The documents indicate that “the Department of state and the Clinton Foundation worked hand in hand in policies and donors” — said in a telephone interview with Fitton, the newspaper “new York times”. Between them there was no clearance” and is contrary to its assurances, ” we read in an interview with Fitton.

What exactly is it? It turns out that huma Abedin, chief assistant to Hillary in the state Department, going then to the Clinton Foundation (there were rumors about her lesbian relationship with Hillary), I received an e-mail from Doug Band, head of Global initiatives of the Clinton Foundation, which asked to reduce superdonate, Lebanese-Nigerian billionaire Gilbert, Chagoury with the American Ambassador in Lebanon. “It Is Jeffrey Feltman. I’m sure he knows, Chagoury. In any case, I’ll talk to Geoff,” replied Abedin on the message of the Band.

But it did not stop. The band asked Abedin, “if possible”, immediately call Chagoury. “It’s very important,” he wrote.

In another letter Mr. Band asked for Abedin to “do him a favour and to employ in the state Department one of the employees of the Clinton Foundation, who recently visited Haiti.

The state Department dipped almost all the information about the employee Fund, including his name, and handed over the letter of the law”.

However, in one part of the letter, uncensored, the Band writes, as “it is important to meet the request of the addressee”. After some time came the reply Abedin: “He we all have on our radar. Staff send him the available options.

The FBI spent more than a year to study private e-mail Clinton, but it is unknown what role was played in this Clinton Foundation.

FBI Director James Comey Jr. turned out to be quite circumspect in his speech last month before the Republican Committee of the house of representatives on monitoring. He twice refused to condemn Clinton and the Foundation for their relationship. And although Mr. Comey was forced to admit “extreme negligence and carelessness” Clinton, he was advised not to open criminal proceedings against Clinton, because neither she nor her staff “did not intend to break the law.” The Ministry of justice agreed to “close the case” after the mysterious meeting bill Clinton with Minister of justice Lynch, “somewhere at the airport”. The American media raised a ruckus, but came out of it?

Although Comey said he is confident in the veracity of the testimony of Hillary Clinton that she’s in for three and a half hours were given to the agents of his Department, he nevertheless noted that her public statements contradict the facts in several key moments. I suspect that it has not done without intervention of President Obama, which puts on Clinton as a successor and protector of his case. However, Republicans in Congress asked the U.S. justice Department brought against Clinton the case of the perjured…

Game giveaway trump Clinton continues. With varying degrees of success.

Melor STURUA in Minneapolis

Related posts:
"Chronic distrust of the USA to Russia is an ideological basis"
"Inspection revealed a mass desertion in the Ukrainian Navy "
Bjoerndalen spoke about how Russia is lucky with Putin
The behavior of officials in social networks will follow


More Stories From Politics