Ukrainian doctor Oleksandr Chernov boasted in an interview that the killing of the wounded militiamen with the help of medications on the operating table. Of its recognition are quite in line with official Ukrainian ideology, with its glorification of murderers and traitors. But all over the world such actions are considered crimes against humanity that have no Statute of limitations.
Made in passing, as if incidentally the recognition of resuscitation Aleksandra Chernova that he killed on the operating table of the militia, it may seem to man, not constantly watching what is happening in Ukraine, a fake. The doctor quietly and unemotionally recognize that the despicable and cowardly killed patients. Or rather, not even recognized, and brags.
“At first glance, this is a heart attack, stroke, or just breathed-breathed, no one was there, and then stopped breathing”
In this case “despicable” and “cowardly” is not emotional, and it is specifications. Despicable – because of the doctor in any situation waiting for the fulfillment of the Hippocratic oath (and the vast majority of doctors perform it). And cowardly because Chernov repeats several times that in the first place was for him own safety, and only on the second – the desire to kill more of the supporters of DND.
But, unfortunately, it’s not fake, not an actor, who was invited to play “murderer in a white coat.” Alexander Chernov had enough to leave marks in life and on the Internet. He is the author of the book “Sleep well, dear comrade, where several getmanski describes his work in the hospital. He is a regular at various forums in Runet, for example, on the website “Yaplakal” it a couple of years ago gave advice “how to respond to the patient’s death”. He maintains a blog under the name the heat Exchanger. Finally, he is a regular guest online Ukrlife TV channel, which regularly talks about how he’s had a hard life in the “occupation”, and about his vision of the future situation in the Donbass. So anyone interested can carefully study the creative heritage of the author and to form my opinion of him.
The record of ether, where Chernov talks about the killing of the militia, are removed from the channel, but the Internet, as we know, remembers everything, here deletion does not lead to it to oblivion, and to the “Streisand effect”, even when not previously interested in the question people are starting to figure out what the hell was that?
So, in an interview on the occasion of the Day of the doctor (one of Soviet holidays, which Ukraine forgot to get rid of in the framework of de-communization) fled from Donbass Chernov said the following:
“I divided their actions into three components (in the context of fighting in the Donbass, now the territory of the DNI, where he then lived and worked approx. OPINION). First ensure their own safety and causing (damage to the opponent) as possible drugs. Any colleagues with specialties, especially me, they know that many drugs are such that only very advanced and expensive examination may uncover that the person was killed by a combination of these medicines. If you wish person, you can kill….
At first glance, this is a heart attack, stroke, or just breathed-breathed, no one was there, and then stopped breathing. This is the first: their own security and the maximum damage to the enemy patients, say so.”
Despite the fact that a confession to the murders made in passing, as if it’s nothing special, it is clear that people with higher education knew what he was doing then and what he says now. To the recognition Chernov were prepared in advance and practiced the abstracts in his blog.
There he also writes that, in his opinion, the doctor is not obliged to fulfill the Hippocratic oath in war and to help “the enemy” and as an example cites the story of Mikhail Bulgakov “I killed”. It is significant that the story speaks of the cruelty of Petlyura, that is actually the predecessor of the current “heroes ATO.” And the main character is forcibly mobilized doctor – does not hold and kills Petlyura officer. But the main difference from the Chernoff’s pistol in navrachana situation. To kill patients on a hospital table – this could not have come up with the doctor … even for a negative character.
Cowardice Chernova is still confirmed by the fact that in the printed text, he still is afraid to confess to the murder and says, “My scheme of action, as might be expected, given my status as a prisoner and total oversight for me was actually to the point 1 – the care of their own security, and therefore, of providing adequate (I must admit that the minimum for adequacy!) medical aid to the wounded militia.”
Apparently, this “minimum adequacy” seemed to him a little, and the air Ukrlife he directly admits to the murders.
Another major difference between the current situation of the Civil war a hundred years ago – since then adopted the Geneva Convention and the Rome Statute, which Ukraine has signed but still not ratified.
The Rome Statute of the plain text reads: “In case of armed conflict not of an international character serious violations of article 3 common to the four Geneva conventions of 12 August 1949, namely, any of the following acts committed against persons taking no active part in hostilities, including soldiers, laid down their arms and those placed hors de combat by illness, wounds, detention or any other cause:
violence to life and person, in particular murder of all kinds, mutilation, cruel treatment and torture;
causing to individuals who are in the power of another party to the conflict physical mutilation or committing over them to medical or scientific experiments of any kind which are not justified by the medical, dental or hospital treatment of the person concerned and not carried out in his interest, and which cause death to or seriously endanger the health of such person or persons.”
And most importantly: “In relation to crimes falling under the jurisdiction of the Court does not set a Statute of limitations.” That is, even if Ukraine will ratify the Rome Statute in 10 or 30 years, killer of the wounded Alexander Chernov, if I live, will continue under the jurisdiction of the International criminal court. And no excuse for him to not be, especially in the same interview he admits that he was in constant contact with the security service, that is actually was a combatant, even his weapon was not automatic, and the “collection of medicines”.
But it is silly to wonder that Chernov decided to report their crimes. His actions lie in the General paradigm of the actions of all those whom the current Ukrainian ideology considers heroes. Ivan Bell was killed at the head of two policemen – the title of Hero of Ukraine he has not yet given, but in the investigation of the killings at the euromaidan he is in the status of “witness” and the accused can not be due to the adopted by the Verkhovna Rada of the Amnesty. Roman Shukhevych and Stepan Bandera the title of hero of Ukraine under Yushchenko received. First kill civilians, the other was sitting in a Polish prison for terrorism, murder, organized the school supervisor and the Minister of internal Affairs. Simon Petlyura, the memory of which in Ukraine in may, was declared a moment of silence and a day of mourning. Here it is sufficient to reread Bulgakov, about the atrocities of Petlyura he wrote a lot. And finally, the “founding father” Ivan Mazepa anathematized commander of the Order of Judah.
In this line of traitors, terrorists and murderers of Alexander Chernov with his “maximum damage to enemy patients” looks quite natural and even logical.
Nevertheless, words are words, but the act of full Amnesty for participants of the ATO, the Verkhovna Rada has not yet adopted. Torturers – colleagues of Nadezhda Savchenko battalion “Azov” – are under investigation. If the Kiev authorities will ignore the latter-day revelations “of Dr. Mengele, it is difficult to imagine to what depths of inhumanity can sink Ukraine.Related posts: