Go to ...

The Newspapers

Gathering and spreading news from various Russian Newspapers

The Newspapers on Google+The Newspapers on LinkedInRSS Feed

Saturday, December 3, 2016

Yavlinsky called the Fcsd data on support of Putin “massive fertilizer of consciousness”


The founder of Yabloko Grigory Yavlinsky considers the emergence of Fcsd that Putin’s support even members of non-parliamentary parties, a sign of anxiety of the authorities about the upcoming unpleasant changes. In turn, the Deputy Chairman of Parnas Ilya Yashin believes such data is the result of the manipulation of public opinion.


photo: Alexander Chernushenko

Grigory Yavlinsky

Representatives of Yabloko and Parnas commented on Thursday the survey data of Fund of development of civil society about the rating of Russian President Vladimir Putin. ,

Recall that according to the study Fcsd, Putin’s support is not only Pro-Kremlin parties, but even parties that represent the non-system opposition. Among these citizens give preference to Putin’s 64%, and approximately the same number are willing to give him a voice in the election.

In this regard, the head of Fund Konstantin Kostin suggested that supporters of the President of the Russian Federation will occupy about two thirds of the seats in the state Duma of the new convocation – at 66%, reports “Interfax”.

However, the founder of the “Yabloko” Grigory Yavlinsky criticized the results of the survey into question. He recalled that the Fcsd was established by the President’s administration. In his opinion, the statement of the Fund’s support for Putin’s non-systemic opposition is dictated by the demand of the authorities that “love was a national, without any exceptions”.

“People find it easier and safer to say that they like Putin, than to explain something else,” – said the politician.

He also stressed that when the authorities start to “massive “fertilizer” consciousness of people “rankings love” – this is a sign of their concern about the possibility of adverse changes.

A similar version is shared by the Chairman of Parnas Ilya Yashin. He believes that such results are often achieved through the manipulation of public opinion. To do this, the authors of the survey so form the questions that get the result they want, and he, in turn, needed to form the “best socio-political agenda” and explaining that “the current government there is no alternative”.

Related posts:
The phenomenon of Zhirinovsky once explained to Karl Marx
The state Duma had refused to revoke the citizenship of those convicted of terrorism and extremism
Turkish rebellion: the fifth in the last decade, the intervention of the military in politics
The Maritime claim of Ukraine to Russia: the story is long, no chance

Recommended

More Stories From Politics